Connect with us

News

ICPC chairman blames community pressure, people’s expectations for endemic corruption in Nigeria

Published

on

Chairman of ICPC, Prof. Bolaji Owasanoye, has attributed the rising level of corruption in public offices and the country as a whole to community pressure and expectations of people in office.

The Independent Corrupt Practice and Other related Offences Commission (ICPC) chairman said this on Tuesday in Abuja at a National Policy Dialogue on Corruption, Social Norms, and Behaviour Change in Nigeria

The event was organised by the ICPC in collaboration with the Anti- Corruption Academy of Nigeria supported by MacArthur Foundation.
Owasanoye, who expressed concern over the prevalence of corruption in the country across the ethnic and religious divides, explained that people expected officeholders to confer benefits from the office they were holding on members of the community regardless of whether such benefits were corrupt practices in themselves or they came from the proceeds of corruption

“The timing of this Policy Dialogue on Corruption, Social Norms and Behaviour Change in Nigeria, could not have come at a better time than now, when the foundation of our social values and norms has become seriously threatened.

“In actual fact, a lot of changes are taking place across the wider Nigerian society. But more worrisome to me, is the emergence and pervasive spread of corruption-inducing social norms across all ethnicities and religious divides.

“In spite of widespread cultural and religious perception of corruption as a negation of societal values, a survey carried out by ACAN-ICPC in 2020 revealed that corruption among public servants is enabled by community ambivalence towards the proceeds of corruption,” he said.

He said that as high as 69 per cent of the public servants surveyed indicated that their community would accept monetary gifts above their annual salaries without questioning the source of the money.

“Corruption is therefore fueled by community expectation of people in office

“There is for example a general belief that groups, networks, and communities expect the holder of an office to confer benefits from (or of) the office on members of the community.

“This is regardless of whether the benefits are corrupt practices in themselves e.g., nepotism, or if the benefits come from proceeds of corruption e.g., embezzlement,” he said.

According to him, there is the common expectation that people in top positions should donate huge sums of money at public functions.

“It is equally expected that government officials should enrich (and/or confer other benefits on) themselves from their office.

“Relations and community members of public officials see nothing wrong with all these, even when they condemn such practices happening in other communities – a case of “it is good for us and not for other communities”.

He said that over the years, the law and order approach to combating corruption had dominated the activities of the anti-corruption agencies.

“Although the law and order approach is necessary to curb corruption, however, it is not sufficient as it has to be complemented with some form of a self or group-regulatory mechanism to achieve the desired behaviour change in both government and society.

“This is where a discussion of corruption, social norms and behaviour change becomes relevant.

“Achieving the goal of behavioural change in a society with endemic corruption involves a complex and sometimes a long process that requires a multi-sectoral brainstorming session to develop appropriate policy framework,” he said.

The ICPC chair said that this was where a policy dialogue platform offered a unique and veritable opportunity.

He, therefore, urged stakeholders to disentangle the web of issues involving political, social, economic, religious, and ethnic factors that fuel corrupt practices;

He urged them to identify how societal expectations from peers, networks, groups, and communities, enable corruption to fester in both government and society

Owasanoye also called on them to identify corruption-enabling social norms that were peculiar to the private sector; and finally develop an appropriate policy framework and measures to counter social norms that fuel corruption.

He said that in carrying out this task, all stakeholders invited to the Policy Dialogue should implement advocacy programmes in their constituencies and lead by example to inspire their members and constituents.

“All stakeholders should list out corruption-inducing social norms that need to be discouraged and anti-corruption social norms that should be encouraged.

“Key stakeholders should institute a reward system for those who demonstrate good behavior or who stand against corruption in their constituencies,” he said.

He said that such a reward system should be elevated to a policy for all administrations to implement, and the ad hoc recognition of good practices and also be elevated to the level of policy not regime-bound.

“Federal and state ministries of education should develop and implement behavior change programmes in primary and secondary schools for the youth.

They also should introduce inter-school debates to promote anti-corruption social norms and behavior change.

“The seven pillars of the National Ethics and Integrity Policy (NEIP) should be incorporated into the advocacy for behaviour change,” he said.

The Director of African Operations, MacArthur Foundation, Dr Kole Shettima, in his goodwill message, spoke of the need to work around the social norm behaviour.

Shettima said that the foundation has worked with a number of institutions to revive social norm behaviour in society.

The President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Yakubu Maikyau, said the NBA was ready to support the ICPC in stamping out corrupt practices in society.

Maikyau said there was a need to discourage practices and begin to interrogate those who suddenly become rich in society, to know the source of their wealth

He said this would serve as a means of reviving the lost social norm and values in society, and we begin to embrace the value so that we don’t socialize lost.

NBA acknowledged the importance of fighting against corruption, saying, “we have improved in the rule of professionals and made some amendment to ensure that the association serves as an agent of fighting against corruption,” he said

Mr Dasuki Arabi, the Director General of Bureau of Public Service Reforms (BPSR), advocates entrenching transparency in public institutions with a concrete and holistic approach.

He said the approach should be able to effectively address the social norms and behavioral change required to affect the desired outcomes towards curbing corruption.

Arabi also urged all to join hands with the ICPC and compliment their efforts to ensure that the National Dialogue Policy moves from a mere mental discourse to a pragmatic approach involving the active participation of stakeholders.

He advised the forum to look beyond the legal and Institutional measures to tackle corruption in the society, but rather focus on societal attitudes and norms that changes corrupt behavior.

“We should encourage collaborative efforts of this gesture to create public awareness on the negative consequences of unethical values and the benefits of a transparent society,” he said. (NAN)

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *